Economic diversification is no longer optional for oil-dependent economies. It is a matter of resilience in a world increasingly shaped by conflict, energy transition, and market volatility.
Nowhere is this clearer than in Iran. Since February 2026, Iran has been embroiled in a direct military conflict involving the United States and Israel, marked by airstrikes, retaliatory missile attacks, and disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz—a corridor that carries about 20 percent of global oil trade. The conflict has pushed oil prices above $120 per barrel and triggered global supply fears, exposing how geopolitics can instantly destabilize oil-reliant economies. Even Iran itself has been forced to expand non-oil sectors under pressure from sanctions and war.
Across Africa and the Middle East, similar vulnerabilities persist. Sudan continues to suffer from conflict-induced oil disruptions, weakening already fragile revenues. Libya remains trapped in a cycle in which oil output rises and falls with political instability, preventing meaningful diversification. Nigeria has made visible progress in fintech and agriculture, yet oil still accounts for more than 80 percent of export earnings, limiting structural transformation.
These cases point to a consistent reality: oil dependence amplifies instability rather than insulating economies from it.
For South Sudan, the stakes are even higher. Oil contributes more than 70 percent of government revenue and dominates exports, leaving the country acutely exposed to external shocks. Recent disruptions in neighboring Sudan have periodically choked pipeline access, cutting into production and state income. The result is a fragile fiscal system tied almost entirely to a single commodity.
Yet South Sudan’s economic potential lies beyond oil. Nearly 80 percent of its population depends on agriculture, and the country possesses vast arable land and water resources. Properly harnessed, agriculture could shift the country from import dependence to food security and even export competitiveness. There is also untapped potential in livestock, fisheries, and cross-border trade with East African neighbors.
The benefits of diversification are clear. A broader economic base would stabilize revenues, create jobs, and reduce vulnerability to global oil shocks. However, the constraints are significant. Poor infrastructure, insecurity, weak institutions, and overreliance on oil rents continue to slow progress.
The path forward must be practical and immediate.
First, South Sudan should commercialize agriculture through targeted investments in irrigation, storage, and farm-to-market roads.
Second, it should allocate a fixed share of oil revenues to a protected diversification fund focused on agro-processing and small industries.
Third, simplifying business registration and offering tax incentives could unlock small and medium-sized enterprises, especially in food processing and trade.
Fourth, strengthening regional trade corridors with Kenya and Uganda would reduce import costs while expanding exports.
Finally, transparency in oil revenue management is essential to build investor confidence and ensure funds are reinvested productively.
South Sudan cannot afford to wait for the next oil shock. The lesson from Iran, Nigeria, Libya, and Sudan is unmistakable: oil wealth without diversification is not strength—it is exposure.
For One People, One Nation!
The writer, Bec George Anyak, is a former Deputy Minister of Finance and Planning, South Sudan.
The views expressed in ‘opinion’ articles published by Radio Tamazuj are solely those of the writer. The veracity of any claims made is the responsibility of the author, not Radio Tamazuj.
and then