Introduction: A Tragedy That Must Become a Turning Point
The recent killing of a young couple in Greater Tonj, leaving behind a five-day-old infant, is not merely another sad story in the long catalogue of communal violence in South Sudan. It is a tragedy that should disturb every conscience. It is a moral alarm. It is a painful reminder that when violence is allowed to become normal, it eventually attacks the very foundations of family, community, faith, and humanity itself.
Across South Sudan, many people have reacted with disbelief, anger, sorrow, and fear. Some have asked how human beings could reach a point where parents of a newborn child could be killed. Others have blamed weak government, illegal firearms, cattle raiding, revenge culture, political neglect, and the collapse of social discipline. All these explanations carry some truth. Yet none of them alone can fully answer the deeper question: how did a proud community, known for courage, resilience, leadership, generosity, and strong traditional values, reach a point where such brutality could become possible?
Greater Tonj is not a land without elders. It is not a land without chiefs. It is not a land without churches. It is not a land without educated sons and daughters. It is not a land without government officials, business people, youth leaders, women leaders, intellectuals, and citizens who understand the cost of war. Yet violence continues to repeat itself. This means the problem is no longer simply a matter of one incident, one clan, one cattle camp, one youth group, or one administration. It is a systemic crisis requiring an honest, courageous, and collective response.
The purpose of this article is not to condemn Tonj as a community. On the contrary, it is written because Tonj matters. Warrap State matters. South Sudan matters. A community with such history, strength, and human potential should not be defined by revenge killings, insecurity, and fear. Tonj can become a model of peace if its leaders and citizens decide to confront the roots of violence with seriousness, fairness, and unity.
The Real Nature of the Crisis
The crisis in Greater Tonj is often described as a security problem. That description is correct, but incomplete. It is also a governance crisis, a justice crisis, a youth crisis, a trauma crisis, a cultural crisis, and a leadership crisis. Violence continues not only because guns are present, but because the institutions and social norms that should restrain violence have become weak.
In peace and conflict studies, scholars have long argued that violent conflict rarely survives on one cause alone. Johan Galtung, one of the founders of modern peace studies, distinguished between direct violence, structural violence, and cultural violence. Direct violence is the killing, raiding, and physical attack we see. Structural violence is the deeper condition that produces suffering, such as poverty, weak services, lack of justice, exclusion, and absence of opportunity. Cultural violence is the mindset that justifies harm, glorifies revenge, or teaches young people that violence is honorable.
Greater Tonj suffers from all three. The direct violence is visible in killings and revenge attacks. The structural violence is visible in limited services, weak policing, poor roads, unemployment, limited courts, and inadequate government presence. The cultural violence is visible when communities quietly protect offenders because they are relatives, when young men are praised for revenge, when compensation replaces prosecution for serious crimes, and when elders fail to speak with one united moral voice.
Therefore, ending violence in Tonj cannot depend on one tool. Dialogue alone is not enough. Military deployment alone is not enough. Peace conferences alone are not enough. Compensation alone is not enough. Sermons alone are not enough. Sustainable peace requires a complete peace architecture: accountable government, functioning courts, empowered traditional authorities, trauma healing, youth opportunity, women’s participation, community policing, disarmament linked to protection, and a renewed moral rejection of revenge.
The Dangerous Normalization of Violence
One of the most dangerous stages in any conflict-affected society is the normalization of violence. At first, killings shock the public. Later, people mourn briefly and move on. After some time, communities begin to expect violence as part of life. Children grow up hearing the language of revenge. Young people inherit grievances they did not create. Families begin to prepare for retaliation before seeking justice.
This normalization is deadly because it weakens the community’s moral immune system. When violence becomes ordinary, people stop asking why it is happening. They start asking only who will be attacked next. This is the point at which society must intervene urgently.
No community can build schools, markets, roads, health centers, churches, farms, and businesses in an atmosphere of fear. No government can deliver services where citizens are constantly mobilized for revenge. No family can plan for the future when young men believe that their identity is proved through violence. No child can grow with confidence where gunfire and mourning become part of childhood memory.
The killing of parents of a five-day-old infant should therefore be treated as a turning point, not as another episode. It must force Greater Tonj to say clearly that some lines must never be crossed. The lives of civilians must be protected. Women, children, elders, and families must never be targets. Even in conflict, humanity must not disappear. If a society loses the ability to protect the innocent, it loses the foundation upon which peace and dignity are built.
Why Revenge Never Produces Justice
Many communal conflicts are sustained by revenge. A person is killed, and relatives feel obligated to retaliate. A cattle raid happens, and a counter-raid is organized. A youth is wounded, and another group prepares for attack. Each side claims justice, yet each act of revenge creates new victims and new grievances.
Revenge is emotionally powerful because it appears to restore dignity. But in reality, revenge does not restore dignity; it multiplies grief. It transfers pain from one family to another. It punishes people who may not have committed the original crime. It turns innocent people into targets. It keeps communities trapped in the prison of yesterday.
Martin Luther King Jr. warned that returning violence for violence multiplies violence and adds deeper darkness to a night already without stars. This moral warning applies strongly to the situation in Tonj. Revenge may satisfy anger for a moment, but it never builds peace. It never brings back the dead. It never heals the wound. It only creates another bereaved mother, another orphaned child, another displaced family, and another reason for future conflict.
For Greater Tonj to move forward, revenge must be replaced by justice. Justice means that the person who commits a crime is investigated, arrested, prosecuted, and punished according to law. Justice means that families do not take the law into their own hands. Justice means that community leaders do not hide criminals. Justice means that government acts fairly, quickly, and consistently. Without justice, peace agreements become temporary pauses between rounds of violence.
What Other Societies Teach Us
Tonj is not the first society to face cycles of communal violence. Other societies have suffered worse tragedies and still found ways to rebuild. The point is not to copy them mechanically, but to learn principles that can be adapted locally.
Rwanda, after the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi, faced one of the most devastating social collapses in modern history. Communities were destroyed, trust disappeared, and the scale of killing shocked the world. Yet Rwanda’s recovery was built on several pillars: accountability, reconciliation, community-level truth telling, state authority, civic education, and development planning. Rwanda’s experience teaches that reconciliation without accountability is fragile, but accountability without reconciliation may not heal society. Both must move together.
Northern Uganda also offers lessons. After years of conflict involving the Lord’s Resistance Army, communities could not recover through security measures alone. There was need for trauma healing, reintegration of former fighters, religious mediation, community ceremonies, livelihood recovery, and psychosocial support. This is important for Tonj because many families have experienced repeated violence. Unhealed trauma can become inherited anger. Children who grow up around revenge may become adults who reproduce revenge unless the cycle is interrupted.
Northern Kenya provides another relevant lesson for pastoral communities affected by cattle raiding and intercommunal attacks. In several areas, progress was achieved through peace committees, early warning systems, joint grazing arrangements, youth peace ambassadors, community policing, and collaboration between local authorities and traditional leaders. The key lesson is that peace must be localized. Government must act, but communities must also own the peace process.
Lakes State in South Sudan is often cited locally as an example where determined leadership, security coordination, and local accountability helped reduce violent disorder. The lesson is not that force alone solves conflict. Rather, when leadership communicates clearly, enforces law consistently, and works with communities, insecurity can be reduced. Tonj needs this balance: firm law enforcement, fair justice, and community reconciliation.
Why Previous Peace Conferences Have Not Been Enough
Greater Tonj has seen many peace meetings, conferences, reconciliations, and public declarations. Some have helped reduce tensions temporarily. Some have produced important resolutions. Some have brought chiefs and youth together. Yet the killings continue. This does not mean dialogue is useless. It means dialogue has too often been treated as an event rather than a process.
A peace conference that ends with speeches but has no implementation mechanism cannot stop violence. A resolution that names no responsible institution cannot protect citizens. A dialogue that does not address weapons, youth unemployment, trauma, accountability, and justice cannot produce lasting peace. A meeting that is not followed by monitoring becomes a public relations exercise.
John Paul Lederach, a respected scholar of peacebuilding, argues that sustainable peace requires relationship transformation across multiple levels of society. It is not enough for senior leaders to meet. Middle-level leaders, grassroots communities, youth, women, religious leaders, and local authorities must all be connected in a long-term peace infrastructure.
This is exactly what Tonj needs. Peace must move from hotel halls and county headquarters into cattle camps, villages, schools, churches, courts, markets, and homes. The conversation must reach the youth who carry guns, the families who protect offenders, the elders who influence community decisions, and the officials who control public authority. Peace must become daily practice, not seasonal ceremony.
The Accountability Gap
The greatest enemy of peace in Tonj is impunity. When people commit crimes and return home freely, the community learns that violence has no cost. When offenders are protected by family, clan, wealth, politics, or influence, victims lose trust in institutions. When justice delays for too long, people turn to revenge.
Francis Fukuyama’s work on state-building emphasizes that effective states must be able to enforce rules impersonally. This means law should apply regardless of identity, clan, status, office, or wealth. Where law becomes selective, citizens no longer see it as justice; they see it as politics.
For Tonj, accountability must begin with a simple principle: the person who kills must answer for the killing. The person who raids must answer for the raid. The person who incites violence must answer for incitement. The person who hides criminals must answer for obstruction. The person who supplies weapons for unlawful attacks must answer for enabling violence.
This accountability should not be collective punishment. Entire communities should not be punished for crimes committed by individuals. Collective punishment deepens resentment and may create more violence. Accountability must be individual, evidence-based, and lawful. That is the difference between justice and revenge.
The Youth Question: From Warriors of Revenge to Builders of Peace
No peace agenda for Tonj can succeed without young people. Youth are often described as the problem, but this is unfair and incomplete. Youth are not born violent. They are shaped by the environment around them. When young people grow up without jobs, education, mentorship, sports, business opportunities, or hope, they become vulnerable to mobilization for violence.
The solution is not simply to blame youth. The solution is to invest in them. A young person who has a skill, a business, a farm, a team, a mentor, or a future is less likely to risk life in revenge violence. A young person who feels respected and included is more likely to become a peace ambassador than a conflict actor.
Tonj needs youth transformation centers, vocational training, sports for peace, cattle camp peace education, literacy programs, entrepreneurship grants, agricultural support, and leadership mentorship. Youth leaders should be included in county security and peace discussions, not only called when violence has already happened.
Every gun placed in the hands of a young person represents a failure of society. Every book, tool, football, business grant, farming input, or leadership opportunity placed in the hands of a young person represents an investment in peace.
The Role of Women and Mothers
Women carry the heaviest burden of communal violence, yet they are often given the smallest role in peace processes. Mothers bury sons. Wives become widows. Girls lose fathers. Women care for displaced families, wounded relatives, orphaned children, and traumatized households. They understand the cost of conflict in ways that many decision-makers do not.
Across Africa, women have played powerful roles in peacebuilding. In Liberia, women’s peace activism contributed significantly to ending civil war. In many local contexts, women have used moral authority, social networks, and community pressure to stop violence. Greater Tonj should learn from this.
Women must not be invited only to sing at peace conferences. They must sit where decisions are made. They must be part of peace committees, early warning networks, reconciliation processes, trauma healing programs, and youth mentorship initiatives. Their voices can help restore the value of life in a society where violence has become too common.
The Role of Chiefs, Churches, and Intellectuals
Traditional leaders remain central to social order in Tonj. Chiefs know the communities, the history of disputes, the families involved, and the moral language that people understand. But chiefs cannot succeed if they are ignored, politicized, under-resourced, or undermined by armed youth. Their authority must be restored and linked to formal justice systems.
Churches also have a major role. The church can speak across clans and political lines. It can preach forgiveness without denying justice. It can support trauma healing, family reconciliation, and moral education. It can remind communities that every human being is created with dignity and that killing the innocent is a sin against God and humanity.
The educated sons and daughters of Tonj also have responsibility. Intellectuals should not only comment on social media after tragedy. They should help design solutions, mobilize resources, mentor youth, support local peace structures, document conflict patterns, advise government, and speak truthfully against revenge. Silence by educated citizens can become complicity when communities are bleeding.
A New Social Contract for Greater Tonj
Greater Tonj needs a new social contract. This social contract should be simple enough for every household to understand and strong enough for government to enforce. It should rest on seven principles.
First, every life has equal value. No life should be treated as less important because of clan, section, gender, age, or political association.
Second, no grievance justifies the killing of innocent people. Even where disputes exist, civilians must never become targets.
Third, criminals must not be protected by families or communities. A person who commits murder or organizes violence should not be hidden because he is a son, brother, cousin, or clan member.
Fourth, justice must replace revenge. Families should seek lawful accountability, not retaliatory killing.
Fifth, government must act fairly and consistently. Selective justice destroys public trust.
Sixth, youth must be given alternatives to violence. Peace must come with opportunity.
Seventh, reconciliation must be rooted in truth. Communities cannot heal by pretending that harm did not occur.
A Policy Agenda for Government and Decision-Makers
If decision-makers are serious about ending violence in Greater Tonj, they should consider a practical policy package rather than isolated reactions after each tragedy. The following ten actions can form the foundation of a Tonj Peace and Stability Compact.
1. Establish a Special Rule of Law Taskforce for Greater Tonj composed of police, prosecutors, judges, correctional officers, customary authorities, and human rights monitors. Its mandate should be to investigate serious crimes, support lawful arrests, and ensure cases move through the justice chain.
2. Create mobile courts to hear serious criminal cases in conflict-affected areas. If courts remain far away, justice will remain distant. Mobile courts can reduce impunity and show communities that the law is present.
3. Strengthen county-level policing with training, logistics, communication equipment, fuel, and accountability mechanisms. Police without mobility cannot respond quickly. Security forces without discipline can create fear instead of trust.
4. Establish permanent community peace committees at county, payam, boma, and cattle camp levels. These committees should include chiefs, women, youth, clergy, administrators, and security representatives. Their role should be prevention, not only reaction.
5. Develop early warning and rapid response systems. Communities often know when tensions are rising. This information must reach authorities before violence occurs.
6. Launch a youth livelihoods and peace program focusing on vocational training, agriculture, sports, small businesses, and civic leadership. Youth empowerment should be treated as a security investment.
7. Support trauma healing and psychosocial programs through churches, civil society, schools, and health facilities. A traumatized society cannot build sustainable peace without healing.
8. Regulate firearms through a protection-first approach. Disarmament should not expose peaceful communities to attack. It must be planned, fair, simultaneous, and linked to credible security guarantees.
9. Hold leaders accountable for incitement. Politicians, elders, youth leaders, or social media actors who encourage violence should face legal consequences. Words can kill when they mobilize communities for revenge.
10. Create a monitoring and evaluation mechanism for peace commitments. Every peace agreement should have responsible actors, timelines, indicators, and public reporting. What is not monitored is usually not implemented.
The Role of Warrap State and National Government
The Government of Warrap State and the national government have constitutional and moral responsibilities to protect citizens. Communities cannot be told to keep peace while the justice system is weak, security forces lack resources, and local authorities are unable to respond.
Government must demonstrate presence not only through force, but through services, fairness, justice, and leadership. A state that appears only after killings cannot build trust. A state that prevents killings earns legitimacy.
This requires budgetary commitment. Peace is not free. Courts require funding. Police require logistics. Chiefs require support. Youth programs require investment. Trauma healing requires trained personnel. Roads and communication systems require infrastructure. If insecurity in Tonj is treated as a temporary emergency rather than a long-term governance challenge, it will continue to return.
The Responsibility of the Community
While government has a duty to protect citizens, communities also have responsibilities. No government can end violence if families hide killers. No peace conference can succeed if youth return home and prepare revenge. No chief can maintain order if communities undermine customary authority. No church can preach peace effectively if believers glorify revenge outside worship.
The people of Tonj must reject the culture of protecting criminals. A criminal should not become a community hero. A killer should not be celebrated. A cattle raider should not be admired. A person who leaves children orphaned should not be defended because of blood relations.
Peace begins when communities change what they reward and what they shame. If violence brings praise, violence will continue. If violence brings shame, accountability, and exclusion from social honor, behavior will change.
Media, Social Media, and Public Language
In the age of social media, conflict can be inflamed within minutes. Rumors spread quickly. Anger travels faster than truth. Graphic images, inflammatory posts, clan insults, and revenge messages can turn grief into mobilization.
Community influencers, journalists, youth leaders, and intellectuals must therefore use public platforms responsibly. Radio, newspapers, WhatsApp groups, Facebook pages, and community forums should promote verified information, calm language, and constructive solutions.
This does not mean hiding the truth. It means telling the truth in a way that protects lives. Responsible speech is part of peacebuilding. Reckless speech is part of conflict.
From Mourning to Movement
The five-day-old infant left behind by this recent tragedy should become a symbol of why Tonj must change. That child represents all children born into communities wounded by violence. That child deserves more than sympathy. That child deserves a society where parents are protected, disputes are resolved lawfully, and the future is not stolen by revenge.
Mourning is necessary, but mourning alone is not enough. Condemnation is necessary, but condemnation alone is not enough. Social media outrage is necessary, but outrage alone is not enough. Tonj needs a movement for peace built on law, morality, development, and reconciliation.
Such a movement must include chiefs, churches, youth, women, intellectuals, business people, government officials, security actors, and the diaspora. It must be locally owned but supported by state and national institutions. It must speak one message: enough is enough.
Conclusion: If Not Now, When?
History shows that no community is condemned to violence forever. Rwanda emerged from genocide. Northern Uganda emerged from insurgency. Liberia and Sierra Leone emerged from civil wars. Pastoralist communities in parts of East Africa have reduced cycles of cattle raiding through peace committees, justice, and community cooperation. Tonj can also change.
But change will not come through wishes. It will come through courage: the courage to arrest criminals, the courage to reject revenge, the courage to speak against one’s own side when it is wrong, the courage to invest in youth, the courage to include women, the courage to strengthen chiefs and courts, the courage to heal trauma, and the courage to build a future different from the past.
The people of Greater Tonj are known for resilience, bravery, generosity, and leadership. These qualities should now be redirected from conflict to peace. True bravery is not killing another human being. True bravery is stopping the next killing. True honor is not revenge. True honor is protecting life. True leadership is not mobilizing anger. True leadership is guiding people away from destruction.
The recent tragedy must not become another headline that fades from memory. It must become the moment when Tonj looks into the mirror and decides to reclaim its humanity.
The question before us is simple: If not now, when? And if not us, who?
Academic and Comparative Ideas Recalled in the Article
• Johan Galtung’s distinction between negative peace and positive peace helps explain why Tonj needs more than silence of guns; it needs justice, opportunity, and restored relationships.
• John Paul Lederach’s peacebuilding framework emphasizes long-term relationship transformation involving grassroots, middle-level, and top-level actors.
• Francis Fukuyama’s writing on state-building highlights the importance of effective institutions, rule of law, and accountability in preventing disorder.
• Comparative experiences from Rwanda, Northern Uganda, Northern Kenya, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Lakes State show that communities can move from cycles of violence toward stability when justice, reconciliation, security, and development are pursued together.
Disarmament Must Be Linked to Protection, Not Fear
Any serious conversation about Tonj must address the widespread presence of firearms. Guns have changed the nature of communal conflict. In the past, disputes could still be deadly, but the availability of modern weapons has made violence faster, more destructive, and more difficult to contain. A disagreement that might once have been mediated by elders can now become a deadly confrontation within minutes.
However, disarmament is one of the most sensitive issues in pastoral communities. Communities fear that if they surrender weapons while neighboring groups remain armed, they will become vulnerable. This fear cannot be dismissed. A policy that demands disarmament without credible protection may fail or even increase insecurity.
Therefore, disarmament in Greater Tonj should be protection-centered, gradual, fair, and simultaneous. It should be preceded by community consultation, security mapping, confidence-building, and clear guarantees from the state. It should be linked to deployment of disciplined security forces, functioning police posts, rapid response capacity, and fair enforcement across all communities.
The message should be clear: the goal is not to weaken communities, but to protect lives. The gun should no longer be the first instrument of justice, identity, or survival. The law should become stronger than the gun.
Local Resource Mobilization for Peace
Peacebuilding requires resources. It is not enough to ask chiefs to mediate without transport, communication, stationery, meeting space, or logistical support. It is not enough to ask police to respond without fuel, vehicles, radios, food, or basic supplies. It is not enough to ask youth to abandon violence when no alternative livelihood exists.
Greater Tonj has sons and daughters in government, business, civil society, academia, the diaspora, churches, and humanitarian institutions. A locally owned Peace Fund could be explored to support non-political peace activities such as community dialogues, trauma healing, youth sports, mobile peace missions, women-led reconciliation forums, and support to traditional authorities. Such a fund must be transparent, audited, non-partisan, and managed by a credible multi-stakeholder board.
Local contribution does not replace government responsibility. Rather, it complements it. Communities that contribute to peace become owners of peace. When people invest in peace, they are more likely to protect it.
A 100-Day Action Plan for Greater Tonj
Decision-makers often speak broadly about peace, but communities need visible action. A practical 100-day plan could help restore confidence. In the first thirty days, Warrap State authorities, county commissioners, chiefs, church leaders, women, youth, and security officials should convene a targeted security and peace forum focused only on implementation, not speeches. The forum should identify conflict hotspots, active revenge threats, known criminal networks, and urgent justice cases.
Within sixty days, a joint early warning structure should be operational at county, payam, boma, and cattle camp levels. Each area should have named focal points responsible for reporting threats before violence occurs. Security actors should also establish response protocols so that warnings do not remain in WhatsApp groups without action.
Within ninety to one hundred days, mobile court sessions, community peace committees, youth peace activities, and women-led reconciliation forums should be launched in priority areas. Progress should be reported publicly. Citizens need to see that peace is not only being discussed; it is being implemented.
The Diaspora and Educated Citizens Must Move Beyond Commentary
The sons and daughters of Tonj living in Juba, other states, neighboring countries, Europe, Australia, Canada, and the United States have an important role to play. Many are educated, connected, and capable of influencing public opinion. However, online debate alone cannot stop violence. Commentary must become contribution.
The diaspora can support scholarships, youth skills programs, peace messaging, documentation of conflict trends, support to widows and orphans, and constructive advocacy for government action. Educated citizens can help translate community pain into policy proposals. They can support research, organize non-partisan peace platforms, and challenge hate speech within their own networks.
Every influential citizen from Tonj should ask: what practical contribution have I made to reduce violence? Have I calmed anger or increased it? Have I supported justice or protected silence? Have I used my voice to heal or to divide?
A Final Appeal to Policy and Decision-Makers
To policy and decision-makers in Warrap State and at the national level, the situation in Greater Tonj should be treated as an urgent governance priority. It should not be reduced to a local quarrel. Repeated communal violence weakens state legitimacy, undermines development, fuels displacement, disrupts markets, damages education, affects humanitarian access, and deepens mistrust between citizens and institutions.
Peace in Tonj is therefore not only a community issue. It is a state-building issue. It is a development issue. It is a national security issue. It is a moral issue.
The government should move from reactive crisis management to preventive peace governance. This means budgeting for peace, strengthening justice, investing in youth, supporting chiefs, deploying disciplined police, regulating firearms, protecting civilians, and measuring progress. A government that prevents violence saves more lives and resources than a government that responds after tragedy.
The time has come for a serious Greater Tonj Peace and Stability Compact, endorsed by government, traditional authorities, women, youth, churches, civil society, and the diaspora. Such a compact should not be another document for shelves. It should be a living framework with responsibilities, timelines, and funding, monitoring, and public accountability.
How Success Should Be Measured
Peace efforts must be measured by results, not by the number of meetings held. Within one year, citizens should be able to see clear indicators of progress: fewer revenge killings, faster arrest of suspects, more cases reaching court, functioning peace committees, reduced cattle camp tensions, increased participation of women and youth, and visible support to victims and orphans. If these indicators do not change, then the peace process is not working and must be corrected.
Public reporting is essential. County authorities and peace committees should share periodic updates with citizens. Communities should know what has been achieved, what remains difficult, and who is responsible for follow-up. Transparency builds trust. Secrecy creates suspicion. In a place where mistrust fuels conflict, open communication is itself a peacebuilding tool.
The writer, Alexander Makuach Kuol, is a South Sudanese doctoral student, development practitioner, researcher, and public affairs commentator. He writes on governance, peacebuilding, leadership, community resilience, and social development in South Sudan.
The views expressed in ‘opinion’ articles published by Radio Tamazuj are solely those of the writer. The veracity of any claims made is the responsibility of the author, not Radio Tamazuj.
and then