The recent clarification by the U.S. government on elections in South Sudan, alongside the role of the African Union C5, reinforces concerns I have consistently raised about the direction of our country’s transition. Let me emphasize clearly: elections are not an end in themselves. As I have said before, without the right political and security conditions, elections risk becoming a trigger for instability rather than a pathway to peace. What matters most is not just holdingelections, but ensuring they are credible, inclusive, and anchored in genuine political consensus.
The African Union C5 and the United States government are right to stress accountability, peace, and responsible governance. Their positions reflect growing international concern that South Sudan must first put its house in order before proceeding to elections. These are not external impositions—they are reflections of the realities on the ground.
I strongly reiterate my position that inclusive dialogue remains the cornerstone of any sustainable political process. Dialogue cannot be meaningful while key political actors are detained or excluded. This undermines trust, weakens the peace agreement, and raises serious doubts about the credibility of any future elections.
Equally, I emphasize that the transitional government must take full ownership of the electoral process. Funding elections through national resources is not optional—it is a clear demonstration of commitment to sovereignty, accountability, and service delivery to the people. A government that cannot fund its own elections or basic services risks losing legitimacy in the eyes of its citizens.
In line with the above, I therefore offer the following recommendations:
- Immediate resumption of inclusive and good-faith dialogue among all parties to the peace agreement
- Creation of a secure and politically open environment before any electoral process begins
- Transparent and accountable use of public resources to fund elections and essential services
- Strengthening of institutions responsible for managing elections to ensure independence and credibility
- Constructive engagement with regional and international partners, including the African Union C5 and the United States
Implications for the Future
If my concerns—and those echoed by the African Union C5 and the United States—are not taken seriously, South Sudan risks entering a dangerous phase. Premature or poorly prepared elections could deepen divisions, undermine the peace process, and potentially lead to renewed conflict.
However, if the government listens and acts decisively, there is a real opportunity to change course. By prioritizing dialogue, inclusivity, and accountability, South Sudan can move toward credible elections that truly reflect the will of its people and strengthen long-term peace.
As I have consistently maintained, the future of South Sudan depends not on rushed timelines but on responsible leadership and genuine commitment to peace.
The time for action is now.
The writer is a policy and political analyst with a strong interest in governance, peacebuilding, and democratic transitions in South Sudan. His work focuses on critical analysis of political developments, public policy, and the implementation of peace agreements, with particular emphasis on accountability, inclusive dialogue, and institutional reform.
The views expressed in ‘opinion’ articles published by Radio Tamazuj are solely those of the writer. The veracity of any claims made is the responsibility of the author, not Radio Tamazuj.