A classroom has a purpose that a community knows by heart. Children arrive with questions. Teachers explain what they can, encourage another attempt and prepare students to return the next morning.
When violence forces families to take refuge in a school building, the purpose of that room changes overnight. A place intended for learning becomes somewhere to seek safety and rest. That change may help protect lives in the moment, but it is also a sign of how much ordinary life has been interrupted.
This concern is not abstract in Greater Tonj. On 30 October 2026, the United Nations Mission in South Sudan reported that renewed intercommunal violence had displaced families in Tonj North, Warrap State. UNMISS peacekeepers who visited affected communities heard about urgent needs, and the report described newly displaced families taking refuge in schools or sheltering outdoors. The Relief and Rehabilitation Commission reportedly estimated that more than 12,000 households had been displaced across Tonj North County, while calling for further verification and coordinated assistance.
Those figures deserve careful qualification. They are reported estimates, not a count I have independently checked. The people living through the insecurity know more about the losses than an outside writer can know. But the central fact is sufficient to demand our attention: families need protection, and places where children should be learning are helping them survive.
I write from Fort Collins, Colorado. I have not visited Akop or Bundir, and I do not claim to speak for the parents, teachers or religious communities of Warrap State. I want to ask a question that the teachings of Jesus Christ place before my own conscience: what does it mean to care for children when adults have made ordinary life unsafe?
In Mark’s Gospel, people bring children to Jesus, and his disciples try to send them away. Jesus insists that the children be welcomed. The story has often been interpreted as a lesson about the humility of faith. It is also a reminder that children are not an interruption to the affairs of grown people. They are people whose present needs matter.
This has several implications for a school used as temporary refuge.
The first is safety. Families escaping violence need secure shelter, clean water, sanitation, food, healthcare and reliable information. A classroom does not automatically provide any of those things. A building that is safe in one sense may have too few latrines, little privacy or inadequate space for those who arrive. People supporting displaced families should listen to their needs rather than assume that opening a door is the end of the task.
The second is dignity. People seeking refuge should not have to recount painful experiences for the benefit of curious strangers. A child who wakes frightened or quiet should not be treated as an inconvenience. Parents should be able to ask questions and participate in decisions about their own families. Respect includes privacy and truthful communication.
The third is continuity. The moment an emergency begins, some educational routines become impossible. Yet learning still matters. A child deserves to be remembered as a student, not only described as a displaced person. Once conditions permit, local educators and community groups need resources to help pupils return to safe learning without placing impossible burdens on teachers or host communities.
Faith communities can contribute in many ways, but they should be clear about what compassion is and is not. A church may offer practical help, companionship or material support. None of those should depend on a family accepting a religious message. Jesus’ teaching about loving one’s neighbour does not authorise making assistance conditional on agreement.
In the parable of the Good Samaritan, a wounded traveller receives immediate help and then continued care. The Samaritan’s concern is not satisfied by a single public act. He arranges what will be needed after he has gone. This is a useful measure for anyone responding to an emergency. Have we thought beyond the first night? Do people have reliable information about services? Are those receiving displaced families themselves receiving support? Is there a plan for children to regain the routines that war has taken from them?
A further truth must be spoken plainly. Repeated violence against civilians must stop immediately. Attacks, threats, abductions, intimidation, retaliatory assaults and the destruction of homes and essential services cannot be justified. Humanitarian access must be protected. Serious abuses require credible investigation and fair accountability. None of this requires blaming everyone who shares a community identity with an alleged attacker.
The suffering of a family cannot become permission to hurt another innocent family. If peace is to become durable, that cycle must end.
A school should never become a permanent substitute for a safe home. It is wrong to praise the resilience of displaced children so often that we forget their need for stability. The courage of families does not erase the responsibility of those who can provide protection, relief and justice.
For anyone far away, it is tempting to look for a dramatic gesture that proves concern. But the needs documented in Tonj North are not an invitation to perform generosity. They are a call to support reliable local and humanitarian efforts, to speak carefully about the facts, and to refuse rhetoric that strips people of their humanity.
There is also responsibility for the words passed to young people. They must not be taught that the injuries suffered by their community give them a lifelong duty to injure others. They can be taught truthfully about what happened, and still be shown that justice is different from revenge.
Jesus called peacemakers blessed. I do not hear that as a blessing for those who look away from suffering. Making peace means protecting those in danger, caring for the injured, refusing collective blame and creating conditions in which ordinary life can begin again.
In Tonj North, the day will come when families hope to leave their temporary shelters behind. The measure of peace will be whether they can return safely to homes, farms, markets and schools.
Let the fighting stop. Let those who are grieving be heard. Let assistance reach the people who need it. And let every child who has slept in a classroom as a place of refuge have the chance to return to a classroom as a place of learning.
The author, Douglas Vandergraph, is a Christian writer and Bible teacher based in Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
The views expressed in ‘opinion’ articles published by Radio Tamazuj are solely those of the writer. The veracity of any claims made is the responsibility of the author, not Radio Tamazuj.
and then